11月4日,24直播网报道,一场利物浦与阿森纳的激烈对决中,裁判的判罚引发了广泛的讨论。前英超裁判格雷厄姆・斯科特在《Ask the Ref》专栏中,对一系列有争议的判罚进行了详细的分析。这些争议主要集中在伊萨克在禁区内遭遇球衣被拉扯、球员疑似假摔、巴尔科拉获得的黄牌以及两起激烈铲球的判罚尺度等方面。
在第20分钟的半场高潮时刻,阿森纳的后卫廷伯在禁区内紧紧抓住了伊萨克的球衣,然而,裁判安迪・马德利并未判定点球。经过VAR的复审,这一决定依旧未被更改。众多球迷对此表示困惑:既然拉扯球衣显然是一种犯规行为,为何判决却显示出如此宽松的尺度。
格雷厄姆阐述,根据足球竞赛规程,凡涉及拉扯行为,均可直接导致任意球判罚;若发生在禁区内,则需执行点球。英超联赛为裁判提供了更细致的判罚指导,强调评估拉扯行为是否对球员接球或争夺球造成实质性影响。裁判在作出裁决时需考虑以下四个要素:球员是否仅专注于对手而忽视球、球员是否完全未触碰球、球员是否有争夺球的意图、拉扯行为是否持续并产生效应、以及是否同时使用双臂进行拉扯。
审视这一赛事的关键时刻,廷伯的确将焦点锁定在伊萨克身上,并未积极争抢皮球。然而,问题的关键在于伊萨克的移动和控球是否遭遇了显著的干扰。在比赛现场,伊萨克本人并未提出异议,他周围的队友也仅显露出些许失望之情。利物浦主教练伊劳拉的抗议显得较为温和,而在演播室的评论员在第一时间内并未将此判为明显的犯规行为。
Graham emphasized that slow-motion replays can exaggerate the action, leading to heightened controversy in post-game reviews. However, on-field referees benefit from superior vantage points. When there is no strong dissent among the players on the field, VAR should refrain from meticulously dissecting frames and forcibly disrupting the flow of the match. Furthermore, he clarified that if the ball is deemed a foul, Timber would face a red card for thwarting a clear scoring opportunity.
众多读者对于此次未判点球的决定表示忧虑,他们担忧这一决定可能激发球员们更频繁地采取假摔行为。然而,格雷厄姆对此持有不同看法,他认为伊萨克在比赛中并未明显感受到拉扯的疼痛,因此选择继续比赛。即便球员故意摔倒,他们表演式的动作往往容易被裁判察觉,这反而使得他们更难以获得点球判罚。
在本轮对决中,两位利物浦队员在发生身体碰撞后均倒地企图诱使裁判判罚,但均未得逞。麦卡利斯特与马杜埃凯之间的争执亦引发热议,评论员指出马杜埃凯并未展现出暴力倾向,两人头部相撞仅是双方激烈对抗的体现,不应直接出示红牌。通常情况下,裁判会向双方出示黄牌,并将此事提交至英格兰足球协会进行进一步审查。
Furthermore, the debate surrounding Balcol's yellow card during stoppage time has gained traction: he initially committed a reckless foul, followed by a physical gesture towards the referee. Theoretically, these are two separate infractions, which could result in a red card from two yellows, yet the standard practice in the English Premier League is to consolidate such incidents, resulting in a single yellow card unless the offenses occur in different segments of the match.
在专栏的终章,对两场关键对决中的铲球动作进行了深入分析:尼奥尼与厄德高的较量,以及马特塔与范德芬的对决。马特塔在冲刺中展现出了更远的距离,他的鞋钉重重地压在了对手的跟腱上,这一行为最终导致了VAR介入并改判为红牌。相比之下,尼奥尼的铲球距离较近,主要作用于脚踝,力度也相对较小。在裁判面临争议性判罚时,选择了黄牌作为最终决定,这一决定遵循了英超联赛中“疑罪从无、轻判为佳”的判罚尺度。
Graham highlighted that in the previous season, only two immediate red cards were issued for severe fouls in the Premier League, but through the use of VAR, an additional seven red cards were subsequently imposed, illustrating the ongoing impact of video referees in correcting dangerous tackles.